此频道用来替代我的脸书朋友圈等会任意删帖封号的平台
The phones of 50,000 individuals, including human rights activists and journalists, have been targeted by surveillance tools that were used by numerous governments. These tools can hack any iOS and Android phone, and there is no way to protect your device from it. It doesn't matter which apps you use, because the system is breached on a deeper level.
According to the Snowden revelations from 2013, both Apple and Google are part of the global surveillance program that implies that these companies have to, among other things, implement backdoors into their mobile operating systems. These backdoors, usually disguised as security bugs, allow US agencies to access information on any smartphone in the world.
The problem with such backdoors is that they are never exclusive to just one party. Anybody can exploit them. So if a US security agency can hack an iOS or Android phone, any other organization that uncovers the backdoors can do the same. Unsurprisingly, this is exactly what has been taking place: an Israeli company called NSO Group has been selling access to the spying tools that allowed third parties to hack tens of thousands of phones.
Since at least 2018, I have been aware that one of my phone numbers was included in a list of potential targets of such surveillance tools (although a source from the NSO Group denies it). Personally, I wasn't worried: since 2011, when I was still living in Russia, I’ve got used to assuming that all my phones were compromised. Anyone who gains access to my private data will be utterly disappointed – they will have to go through thousands of concept designs for Telegram features and millions of messages related to our product development process. They won't find any important information there.
However, these surveillance tools are also used against people far more prominent than me. For example, they were employed to spy on 14 heads of state. The existence of backdoors in crucial infrastructure and software creates a huge challenge for humanity. That's why I have been calling upon the governments of the world to start acting against the Apple-Google duopoly in the smartphone market and to force them to open their closed ecosystems and allow for more competition.
So far, even though the current market monopolization increases costs and violates privacy and freedom of speech of billions, government officials have been very slow to act. I hope the news that they themselves have been targeted by these surveillance tools will prompt politicians to change their minds.
According to the Snowden revelations from 2013, both Apple and Google are part of the global surveillance program that implies that these companies have to, among other things, implement backdoors into their mobile operating systems. These backdoors, usually disguised as security bugs, allow US agencies to access information on any smartphone in the world.
The problem with such backdoors is that they are never exclusive to just one party. Anybody can exploit them. So if a US security agency can hack an iOS or Android phone, any other organization that uncovers the backdoors can do the same. Unsurprisingly, this is exactly what has been taking place: an Israeli company called NSO Group has been selling access to the spying tools that allowed third parties to hack tens of thousands of phones.
Since at least 2018, I have been aware that one of my phone numbers was included in a list of potential targets of such surveillance tools (although a source from the NSO Group denies it). Personally, I wasn't worried: since 2011, when I was still living in Russia, I’ve got used to assuming that all my phones were compromised. Anyone who gains access to my private data will be utterly disappointed – they will have to go through thousands of concept designs for Telegram features and millions of messages related to our product development process. They won't find any important information there.
However, these surveillance tools are also used against people far more prominent than me. For example, they were employed to spy on 14 heads of state. The existence of backdoors in crucial infrastructure and software creates a huge challenge for humanity. That's why I have been calling upon the governments of the world to start acting against the Apple-Google duopoly in the smartphone market and to force them to open their closed ecosystems and allow for more competition.
So far, even though the current market monopolization increases costs and violates privacy and freedom of speech of billions, government officials have been very slow to act. I hope the news that they themselves have been targeted by these surveillance tools will prompt politicians to change their minds.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9655057/Facebook-fact-checkers-cited-Lancet-letter-Wuhan-lab-funder-Peter-Daszak-debunk-lab-leak.html
Mail Online
How Facebook's 'independent fact checkers' cited letter secretly organized by Wuhan lab funder Peter Daszak to 'debunk' leak theory…
For nearly a year, Facebook censored articles exploring the lab leak theory, labeling them 'false information' and punishing news publishers by limiting their reach on the platform.
#碳排放 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/inconvenient-truth-due-li-ions-heavy-carbon-footprint-evs-may-offer-negligible-co2 一個難以忽視的真相：電動汽車與內燃機汽車的二氧化碳排放量可能“微不足道”
泰勒·德登的照片
通過泰勒德登
2021 年 6 月 5 日星期六 - 晚上 08:00
電動汽車的碳足跡 真的 比內燃機汽車低得多嗎？在考慮組裝鋰離子電池所產生的碳和二氧化碳量時，一家公司認為差異可能“可以忽略不計”。
這就是自然資源投資者 Goehring & Rozencwajg (G&R) 的一篇新博客文章的主題，這是一家“基礎研究公司，專注於逆勢自然資源投資，團隊擁有超過 30 年的專業資源經驗。”
該公司成立於 2015 年，本週發布了一篇題為“探索鋰離子電動汽車的碳足跡”的博客文章，他們質疑華爾街日報進行的前 ICE 與 EV 的比較，同時引用了已完成的工作Jefferies 認為，在某些 EV 與 ICE 的比較中，從字面上看，“二氧化碳排放量沒有減少”。
他們的分析“詳細說明了製造鋰離子電池所需的大量能量（以及二氧化碳）。” 由於典型的 EV 平均比類似的內燃機重 50%，因此分析指出，EV 中的“嵌入碳”（即，當它下車時）因此比內燃機多 20-50%引擎。
泰勒·德登的照片
通過泰勒德登
2021 年 6 月 5 日星期六 - 晚上 08:00
電動汽車的碳足跡 真的 比內燃機汽車低得多嗎？在考慮組裝鋰離子電池所產生的碳和二氧化碳量時，一家公司認為差異可能“可以忽略不計”。
這就是自然資源投資者 Goehring & Rozencwajg (G&R) 的一篇新博客文章的主題，這是一家“基礎研究公司，專注於逆勢自然資源投資，團隊擁有超過 30 年的專業資源經驗。”
該公司成立於 2015 年，本週發布了一篇題為“探索鋰離子電動汽車的碳足跡”的博客文章，他們質疑華爾街日報進行的前 ICE 與 EV 的比較，同時引用了已完成的工作Jefferies 認為，在某些 EV 與 ICE 的比較中，從字面上看，“二氧化碳排放量沒有減少”。
他們的分析“詳細說明了製造鋰離子電池所需的大量能量（以及二氧化碳）。” 由於典型的 EV 平均比類似的內燃機重 50%，因此分析指出，EV 中的“嵌入碳”（即，當它下車時）因此比內燃機多 20-50%引擎。
